You are looking at the HTML representation of the XML format.
HTML is good for debugging, but is unsuitable for application use.
Specify the format parameter to change the output format.
To see the non HTML representation of the XML format, set format=xml.
See the complete documentation, or API help for more information.
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<api>
  <query-continue>
    <allpages gapcontinue="Turkeys" />
  </query-continue>
  <query>
    <pages>
      <page pageid="404" ns="0" title="Saxony">
        <revisions>
          <rev contentformat="text/x-wiki" contentmodel="wikitext" xml:space="preserve">Albert Franz began creating a new multi-purpose duck in 1930, by using the Rouen, German Pekin and Blue Pommern Ducks in his breeding program. By 1934 he had it all fairly well down pat, but by the end of World War II few Saxony remained so he renewed his breeding program.

The Saxony Duck became an official recognised breed in Germany for the first time in 1957.  Later, in 1984, it was officially introduced to the United States.  Not long after that it came to Australia.

The plural of Saxony is also Saxony.


PERMISSION IS CURRENTLY BEING SOUGHT FOR FREE USE OF SAXONY PHOTOS FOR THIS PUBLIC PAGE (DUCK, DRAKE, DUCKLING)... IF YOU HAVE A GOOD QUALITY PHOTO OF A SAXONY, AND YOU ARE A MEMBER OF THE BYP POULTRY FORUM, PLEASE PM Chicken07.


'''Classification''': Heavy breed

'''Origin''': Germany

'''Colours''': Saxony come in one colour - see the Exhibition details below

'''Eggs''': are large pearl-white. Overseas Saxony are prolific egg layers yet Australian standard size Saxony are not as prolific. Saxony (especially standard size) may not be overly common in Australia for that reason.

Bantams ducks, on the other hand, are much better &amp; more prolific layers.  For this reason bantams of this breed are slowly becoming more popular than the large variety.

'''Comments''': 
A general purpose breed of duck yet mostly known as exhibition birds. They do not grow as fast as some other breeds and are inclined to change colouring several times before they reach their prime adult plumage &amp; colour. I would not recommend them as a beginners breed as in Australia they are reasonably difficult to obtain, especially the large variety. I recommend always making the extra effort to obtain birds that are as close to true breed characteristics as possible.

'''Selecting Birds''': 
A lot of Saxony are undersize, so it would be in your best interests to consider heavily muscled birds of good size in breeding.  Also select birds with rich clearly defined correct colouring as well as being moderately large, keel-less and solidly built. They are the main things to look for/select in breeders and show birds.

'''Breeding''': 
They are the best layer among the large breed ducks, as well as being an active forager, so it is important to use breeders that are strong legged, active, robust and good layers of large eggs.  Breeding Saxony Ducks is very interesting as well as a fair challenge and very rewarding once you have your bird/s as close to the true breed as possible that you're proud of.

Saxony should have very beautiful soft rich colouring that is clearly defined. They are prone to discolour or fade under long exposure to the sun. Your birds will then have a washed out look, so shade is necessary to avoid this in exhibition birds.

'''Feeding''': 
Usually Saxony are active foragers, so ideally would not need as much feeding as Muscovies. On the other hand, as I have mentioned above, a lot of Saxony are undersize, so that needs to be taken into account for breeding and feeding. 

'''Availability''': 
Standard size Saxony ducks are not a very popular duck overall, however bantams are on the increase as they become more recognised and popular.  They are reasonably priced due to them being an attractive non-popular duck. Good show specimens of good characteristics are a fair price.



'''Exhibition''': 

'''CHARACTERISTICS'''

'''CARRIAGE''' - Strong, with a broad body and no trace of a keel.
'''TYPE''' - Long and stocky, with a long broad back that is slightly sloping to the rear. The breast is to be broad and deep with no sign of a keel. Wings need to be neatly lying into the sides and not too long. Tail is long and carried closed.
'''HEAD''' -  Long and flat, with the bill of moderate length and width.
'''NECK''' - Average length and not thin.
'''LEGS AND FEET''' - Average length and set almost midway in the body.
'''PLUMAGE''' - Lies close into the body and soft/light under feathering.
'''AVOID''' - Broken neck ring in drake, pale eyes, upright Walk, slipped wings, coloured nostrils, dark underfeathering, brown head on drake, white bib, any deformity.

'''COLOURS''':
Duck &amp; Drake:
Eyes: Brown. 
Legs &amp; Webs: Dark yellow.

Drake: 
Head and Neck: Blue as far down to the white ring. Lower part of neck, shoulders and breast need to be a rust red colour, with slight silver lacing on the breast. 
Back and Rump: Blue-grey. 
Tail feathers and wings: Oatmeal with blue wing bars.
Bill is either plain yellow or with pale green shading.

Duck: 
Head neck and Breast: Buff with a white eye line. There is a suggestion of a light broken neck ring. 
Back and lower breast: Paler buff. 
Wings: Cream. 
Wing Bars and Tail: A light shade of blue. 
Bill is either plain yellow or with brownish shading.


'''WEIGHTS'''

'''FOWLS'''

Drake: 3.2kg to 3.6kg

Duck: 2.7kg to 3.2kg

'''BANTAMS'''

Drake: not officially recognised in Australian Standards Edition 1

Duck: not officially recognised in Australian Standards Edition 1


== Internet sources ==

poultry1's Breed Profile on BYP Forum - [http://forum.backyardpoultry.com/viewtopic.php?t=7967780]

poultry1 acknowledges the following internet sources

http://feathersite.com/Poultry/Ducks/Sax/BRKSax.html 

http://www.domestic-waterfowl.co.uk/saxony.html 

http://www.ashtonwaterfowl.net/heavy_ducks.htm</rev>
        </revisions>
      </page>
      <page pageid="403" ns="0" title="Silver Appleyard">
        <revisions>
          <rev contentformat="text/x-wiki" contentmodel="wikitext" xml:space="preserve">The Silver Appleyard was developed by the respected poultry man Mr Reginald Appleyard in Britain by the 1930s or 1940s at his Priory Waterfowl Farm at Ixworth, England. He called his place ‘England’s Leading Stud of Ducks and Geese’. His goal was to produce a type of duck for utility, exhibition, and meat ,“to make a beautiful breed of duck, with a combination of beauty, size, lots of big white eggs, and a deep long and wide breast.” 

By the time Mr Appleyard died in 1964 the breed had not been standardised in the USA. Following World War II interest in waterfowl breeds declined and the breed was close to extinction. By the 1970s respected breeder Tom Bartlett, of Folly Farm England, who shared the same interests as Appleyard, went on to get the breed more recognised and standardised. Bartlett developed the Miniature (bantam) Appleyard which arrived in the USA in the 1960s. In 1998 the American Poultry Association held a meeting to recognise the Silver Appleyard as an official breed and in 2000 it was added to the American Standard. 

History of the breed's arrival &amp; development in Australia is scarce.

Today it is known around the world as a beautiful show bird, and is slowly becoming closer to Mr Appleyard’s original aim of a good all purpose duck which matures quickly for the table and lays well.  Their plumage is rather sleek and silky, with their colouring and patterning being just one reason why this breed is so attractive to the eye. 

There is a section for bantam / miniature versions of this breed in the Standards, and they were rather up in numbers at the Canberra National in June 2008. Bantams are rather easier to breed and are more prolific and hardier than the larger variety, so you are probably best to start off with these rather than the large variety of this breed if you are just starting out with breeding or showing or both. The bantams can fly easily (just like all bantams). The bantams of this breed would make good backyard &amp; children's pets. 


PERMISSION IS CURRENTLY BEING SOUGHT FOR FREE USE OF WELSH HARLEQUIN PHOTOS FOR THIS PUBLIC PAGE (DUCK, DRAKE, DUCKLING)... IF YOU HAVE A GOOD QUALITY PHOTO OF A WELSH HARLEQUIN, AND YOU ARE A MEMBER OF THE BYP POULTRY FORUM, PLEASE PM Chicken07.


'''Classification''': Heavy breed

'''Origin''': England

'''Colours''': Silver

'''Eggs''': are large &amp; white from the large variety. Some written records state they lay 100-180 eggs per year but in Australia the large variety doesn't lay as well as that.  Bantams are good layers of smaller tinted/white eggs 

'''Comments''': 
A general purpose duck, in Australia they are mainly kept as exhibition birds. Compared with Pekin Ducks, the Appleyard does not grow quite as fast, however they have much more interesting colours, are better layers, better foragers, and are more likely to incubate their own eggs. They are also fairly calm.


'''Selecting Birds''': 
Select birds that are robust, strong-legged and excellent producers of large white eggs. Many Appleyards are undersized, so birds of correct size with solid muscles need to be considered for breeding. On the other hand, for exhibition select big, solid birds with no keels, smooth silky plumage and proper colour, as well as being true to type.  Avoid lack of cheek and throat markings, lack of iridescent blue on wings, or keels &amp; colours other than stated in the Australian Standard. Also avoid birds that are excessively over or under weight or that do not come close to the Silver Appleyard breed standards.

'''Breeding''': 
They mature quickly and are an interesting and rewarding duck to breed, although the colouring is difficult to keep well and maintain through breeding. Don’t hesitate to chat to other breeders for more information and I’m sure you will be well on the way. It has been known that most breeders to have a bit of a difficult time breeding them true to the Australian Standard (especially the large version), but it is very rewarding once you have struck the right bird/s, that generally fit the the criteria.  

'''Feeding''': 
They are very good foragers so, unlike Muscovies, they do not need to be fed much or often, as the Appleyard does not lie around depending on you for their food. Instead they go out and forage around themselves. They can be easily overfed too, so watch for weight.

'''Availability''': The large version of this breed is not overly common but is slowly making a comeback. The bantam variety is slowly increasing in popularity as well.  Good healthy, vigorous birds from decent show lines can be a fair price. The bantam variety can be a little more costly than the large variety as they are less common.


'''Exhibition''': 

'''CHARACTERISTICS'''

'''CARRIAGE''' - Slightly erect with the back showing a gentle slope from the shoulders to the tail. Looks lively.
'''TYPE''' - The body should be compact and well rounded, yet broad. The tail is also broad, with the drake having the curls.
'''HEAD''' -  Alert &amp; fine with the bill of medium length &amp; width. Eyes prominent. 
'''NECK''' -  Of medium length &amp; held upright.
'''LEGS AND FEET''' - Legs short and set midway in the body.

'''COLOURS''':
Duck &amp; Drake:
Eyes hazel. Bill yellow. Legs light orange.

Drake: Head and upper neck to be green-black with silver white throat, flecked with fawn. Silver-white ring completely encircling the base of the neck. Remainder of neck below the ring, and shoulders, are a light claret colour. There is a suggestion of this colour running along the upper thigh coverts, but not onto the flank. His wing coverts, lower breast, underbody &amp; flank are a light silver colour, with the usual band of iridescent blue on the wing. Back and rump is black-green, with white tips to the tail feathers.

Duck: Silver white crown and back of neck, flecked with fawn. Deep fawn line through the eyes. Shoulders and back flecked strongly with fawn, followed by the usual iridescent blue on the wings. The tail is fawn.

'''WEIGHTS'''

'''FOWLS'''

Drake

Duck

'''BANTAMS'''

Drake

Duck


== Internet sources ==

poultry1's Breed Profile on BYP Forum - [http://forum.backyardpoultry.com/viewtopic.php?f=16&amp;t=7969710]

poultry1 acknowledges the following internet sources

http://www.domestic-waterfowl.co.uk/silapplge.htm

http://feathersite.com/Poultry/Ducks/Apple/BRKApple.html

http://www.silverappleyard.co.uk/

http://www.landoftobe.com/picturegallery2.html</rev>
        </revisions>
      </page>
    </pages>
  </query>
</api>